K. Chopra
To Win
B. Baker
To Win
Justin Roberts vs Keshav Chopra Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L W W L
Form
W L W W W L W W L WHead-2-Head: Roberts 0 - 1 Chopra
They have played 2 sets in total, with Roberts winning 0 and Chopra winning 2. The last match between Roberts and Chopra was at the M15 Vero Beach, 24-04-2025, First, Clay with Keshav Chopra getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Justin Roberts | 0 |
| Keshav Chopra | 1 |
M15 Vero Beach(24-04-2025)
6
1
6
4
| Roberts | Stats | Chopra |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (16-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 899 | Ranking | N/A |
| 753 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 28 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (139-120) | Career Total W/L | 56% (60-47) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Keshav Chopra
Player
Justin Roberts
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:10:49 | Average Match Time | 1:10:49 |
| 57% (24/42) | 1st Serve % | 61% (27/44) |
| 58% (14/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 81% (22/27) |
| 50% (9/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 0% (0/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 30% (13/44) | Return Points Win % | 45% (19/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Justin Roberts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Keshav Chopra
Player
Justin Roberts
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Justin Roberts
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
view more
Keshav Chopra Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Keshav Chopra
Player
Justin Roberts
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Keshav Chopra
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keshav Chopra
Player
Matthew Summers
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Keshav Chopra
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keshav Chopra
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keshav Chopra
Player
Tiago Silva
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 5-7 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Keshav Chopra
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (139/120) | Win/Loss | 56% (60/47) |
| 54% (317/269) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (128/112) |
| 51% (2879/2714) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1221/1093) |
| 53% (73/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (42/34) |
| 54% (61/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) |
| 50% (5/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 536 | Aces Total | 171 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 585 | Total Double Faults | 150 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:42 |
| 398.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 307.05 |
| 61% (5891/9628) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2895/4763) |
| 68% (4033/5891) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1912/2895) |
| 47% (1756/3739) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (930/1868) |
| 41% (325/797) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (184/419) |
| 37% (3444/9259) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1805/4607) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (5/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (134/115) | Futures W/L | 58% (60/44) |
| 54% (136/251) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (58/105) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 62% (47/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 46% (35/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (17/26) |
| 85% (143/121) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (56/51) |
| 14% (143/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (56/5) |
| 15% (116/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (51/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
